![]() |
|||
Were connected, but more alone
By Anne Taylor Fleming Cellular telephones are so ever present now that we somehow no longer
bother about them or register the profound changes they have wrought in
our culture and our behavior. After all, weve all had telephones
forever. The cell phone is just a ready-to-trot wireless version, a gadget
of the utmost convenience. So whats the big deal? The technology got ahead of any etiquette, and sense we might have a
public decorum, so that we no longer blanch when we overhear people confiding
in, yelling at or cooing in the ear of someone else through their cell
phones. Weve become a nation of compulsive communicators, nonstop
babblers airing our most private thoughts in the most public of places-
an airport lounge, a restaurant banquette, a city street. Were now all part of each others audiences. Its as
if we live in a virtual-reality TV talk show, a rolling 12 step public
marathon, with complete strangers spewing out intimacies or fighting right
in front of us, needful of the validation of our attention. Its
as if nothing is real anymore unless it happens in public with an audience,
and the cellular phone is the perfect little gizmo to make this possible. Whats wrong with all of us? Why the desperate need to be vocally
tethered to someone else at all times? Can we not stand the downtime,
the silence of our own company? Even children are wired up, toting their
own phones and beepers, so that they, too, will learn to be strangers
to themselves, unused to stillness, unaware that there is, or should be,
a demarcation between public and private. The rest is posturing: Life as a spectator sport, precisely what weve
turned sex into. The accent is not longer on the act itself but on the
postcoital play-by-play. Like the tabloid TV shows, the postmodern sitcom
is often little else but a titillating talkathon in which groups of friends
sit around and dissect their sexual encounters for each other. They cannibalize
their meaningful experiences and turn them into cheap anecdotes to be
served up on a platter to the rest of their clique. These phones have changed a very nature of gossip; theyve made
it quicker, crueler, more pervasive and instantaneous. There is no time
to edit, pull back, savor. Everything is fodder, fair game, grist for
the cell-phone mill. All to say that we seem to have given up on privacy altogther- on the
very idea of its virtures. Youre not alone as long as you have your
phone tucked your purse or pocket, your cellular hedge against loneliness. No doubt, thats what the phones are ultimately about: loneliness
and a frantic attempt to evade it. But the irony is that they make it
worse. Think of it: Youre walking down a throbbing city street,
noise and people all around, human pageantry, but youre busy chatting
with a friend or arguing with a spouse via your speed dial. Youre
coocooned disconnected from the things and people around you, experiencing
that weird nonintimate- intimacy, that weird public-privacy that characterizes
so many of our modern interactions, be they via the cellular phone or
the Internet. Its not unusual these days to see two people having
lunch, forks in hand, talking not to each other but to someone else via
their respective cell phones. Clearly were more hooked up than ever
and, on some level, more lonesome. Why else all the manic phoning, then
need to be reachable by somebody, anybody, anywhere and everywhere? By any measure, cell phones waste more time than they save, like many
of our other so-called timesaving devices. They embroil us
in endless, unnecessary chatter that only serves to abbreviate our already
overstimulated attention spans. Yes, there are true emergencies- on the road, in an accident, in a faltering democracy where a coup is imminent. Then a cellular phone can be a lifeline. But thats not what most people are using them for on a daily basis. Theyre using them to ward off the stillness, the demons, the specter of loneliness. |
|||
| << Back to Articles >> |